Monthly Archives: May 2009

A Plan

Ken Doctor, a contributor, wrote a stirring call for young people to get involved in saving journalism here. In this blog posting, he proposes a plan similar to the popular Teach For America plan, where recent graduates sign on to teach in failing schools for two years (it is quite prestigious).

So let’s start with a News Corps of 1000, and a starting wage of $35,000 a year, a decent start and parallel to what TFA provides…One thousand new journalists would be a start and a no-lose test. I guarantee we’d learn things about the craft of journalism that we’ve only conjectured about.

One key ingredient for this plan to work would be the separation of the young journalist from the “traditional newsroom.” As a young journalist in a newsroom, all you do is try to find your style by imitating those styles around you.

That will not produce new ideas.

What we need is a corps of young journalists, fresh out of colleges from across the country, who are brimming with new ideas. We need those who have tried things that have worked and things that have failed.

We need a fresh voice. Too often in newspapers, we try to guess what young readers would want, yet we never actually go to the source. Why not let our young writers try to figure it out?


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

What Now?

A new study conducted in Europe found turning over newspapers to a Web-only format may not drive readership online:

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

It’s a Micro-payment World After All

Sorry for the sabbatical from blogging. I was wrapping up a tough spring semester, and I am just now attempting to get back into my media-monitoring habits.

Here’s a good one to start with: (See story, here.)

I’ve mentioned micro-payments before, and I just don’t think the proposed system will work. Here’s part of the problem:

Pricing for individual articles and for premium subscriptions had yet to be decided, [Robert Thomson, editor-in-chief of Dow Jones and managing editor of the Journal] said, but would be ‘rightfully high.’

For me, the real appeal of online newspapers is that I can pick and choose my news from a variety of publications. I can get my financial and health news from, my government news from, my local news from, and my sports news from

Clearly, I would not be willing to pay for online subscriptions to each of these papers (plus the many others I scan from day to day). Nor would I be willing to pay astronomical fees for individual stories scattered throughout the newspapers.

Maybe there is some alternative. John Temple, former editor, president, and publisher of the Rocky Mountain News, offers this analogy:

Costco charges a membership fee before customers can take advantage of the great values it offers. Users pay it willingly once they see the benefits. I think newspapers could take a page from Costco’s book.

Temple, now a blogger at, suggests readers will pay a “membership fee” for a resource only a newspaper can offer: useful information. Temple says newspapers can be “an information company that can help people do everything from save money on groceries to pick the best school for their child to report road conditions in real time.”

People will pay for niche services. It’s true. And no blogger could ever hope to wield the networking power that a newspaper can. It’s an asset we seem to have forgotten we possess.

It will be interesting to see how this WSJ venture unfolds. I doubt it will have the same success as online newspaper ventures, such as, which has raised more than $10,000 via micro-payments (see article here).

The thing that makes us want to contribute to ventures like and (the Rocky Mountain’s Post’s endeavor to live online) is the grassroots appeal. We want to see that underdog, second-city paper rebound and grow.

But how much pity will we muster for Rupert Murdoch and his newspaper titan chronicling the happenings of Wall Street (which isn’t exactly winning over the American public right now)?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized